Saturday, September 6, 2008

Cowboy Up

Whether it in the office or the bedroom, language is a completely vital tool for everyday interaction. It is an absolutely necessary asset to our lives: but do we abuse our ability to communicate?
When in a social setting, it's often overlooked, that our common everyday communication may be detrimental to others. For instance, solely for the sake of being funny, a friend will single out one of his fellow companions and poke fun or embarrass him in public. This malicious act can hurt ones feelings, but frankly these situations aren't anything to be concerned about. Our community as a whole needs to grow up.
This thought or argument that we must be politically correct or watch carefully what we say around others is nothing but sensitive figures not wanting to step on anyones toes. Modern society is becoming more and more falsified due to our sugar-coating of what we really want to say. A growing number of people are cutting our verbage down for overly sensitive whiners.
Now, this doesn't mean I agree with racial slanders or blatant misuse of hate words. It simply means Americans need to "cowboy up" a bit and stop looking so deeply into every little thing thats said that may be semi-controversial just because we can. Language does not oppress people. When is the last time you told someone to sit down and be quiet and instantly shackles bound the person to the chair and their voice mysteriously disappeared, NEVER.
The underlying theme oppressing Americans is the sensitivity we have to certain words and phrases due to the constant barrage we receive from corporate america telling us that we must walk on egg shells while voicing an opinion. This thought really takes a lot out of the true meaning the person may be wanting to get across.
Words only have the power that the receiver puts to them.
We are fools to put on these different masks showing concern and care for how we word or say things. These fake appearances are almost offensive. Say what you are meaning not what "the man" says is okay. We are taking away from the validity one may have with another when first meeting, say in the business world, because our speech is so practiced everyone just says the same stuff as to not be hurtful or offensive. This tactic is a smart one but only is because it is the way we must be and society has conformed to these ideals. One can almost predict the words and the way the rhetoric will be arranged simply after asking a question. According to the common politically correct radical they would argue there are only so many ways to say something in order to keep the other person from taking offense.
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words shall never hurt me.
The last five words of this grade-school rebuttal, should be taught to those responsible for this new age movement of political correctness. Not to be rude to any and all who agree with this movement, but this sweet talk era we have living today needs to end. Words are losing there true meanings.
I hope that this nonsense molded way of speaking will soon come to an end. Freedom of speech was given to this country for a reason. Our forefathers didn't discuss what we could and couldn't say. They didn't write down that we may have freedom of politically correct speech. No they gave us free rein over any word, phrase, or idea we could think of. This falsified view must be put behind us. Veritas numquam perit. Language is meant o be use to its full effect, so do it!

10 comments:

Eric Robbins said...

I completely agree with your 'cowboy up' idea. The voice of this paper sounded sarcastic at times, especially the part about when someone says sit down and shut up and they instantly sit down and are shackled to their chair and their voice goes away.. haha..good stuff man.

Unknown said...

Confident, almost angry (at the way language is being abused).

Nick Longley said...

Well, first of all, I think that-*IS CRUSHED BY WALL OF TEXT*

Break it up, please!!!


Anyway, let's see...


"Cowboy up"? Did you think about how that might offend cowboys? Jerk.


When is the last time you told someone to sit down and be quiet and instantly shackles bound the person to the chair and their voice mysteriously disappeared, NEVER.

That sentence is a little awkward, grammatically speaking. Just pointing it out - you should have made "never" its own sentence for dramatic effect, also.

Words are losing there true meanings.

Wrong "there". (should be "their").

Other than some tiny small problems, it seems to be a pretty good essay. I'd say your voice is something like...disgusted?

jordanraabe said...

I'm getting an "insensitive" voice from this one, with maybe a dash of "rant?" Maybe I'm completely wrong.

Sorry Colby, but Nick's right, a few sentences need some reworking so that they read easier, specifically the first sentence of the second paragraph:

"This thought or argument that we must be politically correct or watch carefully what we say around others is nothing but sensitive figures not wanting to step on anyones toes."

Just rearranging the bits a little could really help the flow.

Dave Soltes said...

Even if it was grammatically perfect, I also really enjoyed the bit about the chair and shackles. (For the record, it's a question without a question mark)

I'd say the tone overall was frustrated and angry. This seemed like something that had been bugging you for a long time.

Austin Page said...

I....yea break up the text.
Although if you tried to break it up by indenting, I understand because I did that too the first time. But indenting doesn't work when the essay is published.

Secondly, I think it's a pretty enjoyable essay, but the spelling mistakes (little things like There vs. their) are really distracting, so just read through your essay when you're done with it to flatten those out a little.
Especially when there's weird grammar in the first sentence.

Anyway, I'm having trouble figuring out these voices. I think just because I don't really know anyone's personal voice yet, so I can't distinguish what's different about their writing from how it normally would sound.

Are you... annoyed?

Kyle Miyamoto said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kyle Miyamoto said...

I thought it was a pretty good essay.

The voice was a bit hard to distinguish but I'm going to guess sarcasm.

I agree with you that America does need to grow up.

Colby Suder said...

I am the author, Sarcasm

JohnFox said...

It is a few hundred words short of the 800 mark, so watch out for that.

I don’t register the voice as sarcasm, but I do think you have a fairly strong voice, with some good verbs and strong language, which will serve you well in later essays.

I like the focus that rebels against notions of oppressive language. I think you take it too far by saying there’s no oppressive language, but I think the argument that too many people read too much as being oppressive is solid. However, I don’t think you really back it up. Just a few examples of language or phrasing that is regarded as oppressive (but shouldn’t be) would be helpful.

You do switch between oppressive and offensive without regarding the differences, but that’s because we probably used the terms too sloppily in class. Just remember for next time that words are never true synonymns: parse out the minute differences and use them to their full distinctive advantage. (In other words, too many people are oppressed (by themselves), but we should still avoid outright offensive language – a distinction like that can help you specify your argument).

And although the truth never perishes, I don’t know if Latin is the right move here. George Orwell might complain. It was kind of funny, but I don’t know about sarcastic.